Congo vs Rwanda: Adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments (current LCU)
Congo
0 current LCU
in 2011
Rwanda
0 current LCU
in 2007
Congo rank
5th
Rwanda rank
5th
Adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments (current LCU) over time
- Congo
- Rwanda
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 0 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 22 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.51 billion current LCU | -4.55 billion current LCU | 59.06 billion current LCU | Congo |
| 2000s | 2.82 billion current LCU | 0 current LCU | 2.82 billion current LCU | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments, Congo or Rwanda?
- Congo, at 0 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments between Congo and Rwanda?
- 0 current LCU, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2007.
- How do Congo and Rwanda rank globally for adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments?
- Congo ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 22 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as Adjustments to foreign scheduled principal repayments (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Principal repayments are actual amounts of principal (amortization) paid in currency, goods, or services in the year specified.