Algeria vs Botswana: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Algeria
- Botswana
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 400 current LCU against 378 current LCU in Botswana, a difference of 22 current LCU.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Algeria has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 38th and Botswana ranks 39th of 50 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,525 current LCU | 206.25 current LCU | 2,319 current LCU | Algeria |
| 2000s | 3,278 current LCU | 295 current LCU | 2,983 current LCU | Algeria |
| 2010s | 400 current LCU | 378 current LCU | 22 current LCU | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Algeria or Botswana?
- Algeria, at 400 current LCU against 378 current LCU in Botswana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Algeria and Botswana?
- 22 current LCU, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Botswana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Algeria and Botswana rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Algeria ranks 38th and Botswana ranks 39th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.