Angola vs Kenya: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Angola
- Kenya
How they compare
Angola currently reports 4,500 current LCU against 3,395 current LCU in Kenya, a difference of 1,105 current LCU.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.3 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Angola ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 29th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.21 current LCU | 1,886 current LCU | 1,842 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2000s | 3,975 current LCU | 3,283 current LCU | 692.08 current LCU | Angola |
| 2010s | 4,500 current LCU | 3,395 current LCU | 1,105 current LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Angola or Kenya?
- Angola, at 4,500 current LCU against 3,395 current LCU in Kenya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Angola and Kenya?
- 1,105 current LCU, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kenya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Angola and Kenya rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Angola ranks 27th and Kenya ranks 29th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.