Botswana vs Eswatini: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Botswana
- Eswatini
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 378 current LCU against 356.01 current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 21.99 current LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 39th and Eswatini ranks 40th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 206.25 current LCU | 181.79 current LCU | 24.46 current LCU | Botswana |
| 2000s | 302.62 current LCU | 340.44 current LCU | 37.81 current LCU | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 378 current LCU | 356.01 current LCU | 21.99 current LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Botswana or Eswatini?
- Botswana, at 378 current LCU against 356.01 current LCU in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Botswana and Eswatini?
- 21.99 current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eswatini?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Eswatini rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Botswana ranks 39th and Eswatini ranks 40th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.