Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Chad
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Chad currently reports 53,100 current LCU against 48,000 current LCU in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 5,100 current LCU.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 10th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th of 50 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 85,767 current LCU | 31,922 current LCU | 53,845 current LCU | Chad |
| 2000s | 70,800 current LCU | 48,000 current LCU | 22,800 current LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Chad or Guinea-Bissau?
- Chad, at 53,100 current LCU against 48,000 current LCU in Guinea-Bissau as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
- 5,100 current LCU, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2000.
- How do Chad and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Chad ranks 10th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.