Chad vs Togo: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Chad
- Togo
How they compare
Chad currently reports 53,100 current LCU against 35,400 current LCU in Togo, a difference of 17,700 current LCU.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.5 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Togo ahead.
Chad ranks 10th and Togo ranks 13th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88,190 current LCU | 115,182 current LCU | 26,992 current LCU | Togo |
| 2000s | 54,870 current LCU | 69,840 current LCU | 14,970 current LCU | Togo |
| 2010s | 53,100 current LCU | 35,400 current LCU | 17,700 current LCU | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Chad or Togo?
- Chad, at 53,100 current LCU against 35,400 current LCU in Togo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Chad and Togo?
- 17,700 current LCU, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Togo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Togo rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Chad ranks 10th and Togo ranks 13th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.