Eswatini vs Lesotho: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Eswatini
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 356.01 current LCU against 315 current LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 41.01 current LCU.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Eswatini ranks 40th and Lesotho ranks 41st of 50 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 158.63 current LCU | 405.4 current LCU | 246.77 current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 336.54 current LCU | 340.85 current LCU | 4.31 current LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Eswatini or Lesotho?
- Eswatini, at 356.01 current LCU against 315 current LCU in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Eswatini and Lesotho?
- 41.01 current LCU, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Lesotho?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Eswatini and Lesotho rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Eswatini ranks 40th and Lesotho ranks 41st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.