Kenya vs Mauritius: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Kenya
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3,450 current LCU against 3,395 current LCU in Kenya, a difference of 55 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 28th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,886 current LCU | 2,750 current LCU | 863.75 current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 3,361 current LCU | 2,090 current LCU | 1,271 current LCU | Kenya |
| 2010s | 3,395 current LCU | 2,875 current LCU | 520 current LCU | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Kenya or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 3,450 current LCU against 3,395 current LCU in Kenya as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Kenya and Mauritius?
- 55 current LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mauritius?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Kenya and Mauritius rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Kenya ranks 29th and Mauritius ranks 28th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.