Chad vs Mauritius: Business telephone connection charge
Business telephone connection charge over time
- Chad
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 120.18 current US$ against 107.21 current US$ in Chad, a difference of 12.97 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 5th and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 195.19 current US$ | 140.95 current US$ | 54.24 current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | 98.4 current US$ | 71.31 current US$ | 27.08 current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 107.21 current US$ | 74.71 current US$ | 32.5 current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone connection charge, Chad or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 120.18 current US$ against 107.21 current US$ in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone connection charge between Chad and Mauritius?
- 12.97 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritius?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Mauritius rank globally for business telephone connection charge?
- Chad ranks 5th and Mauritius ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone connection charge (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation (or connection) refers to the one-off charge involved in applying for business basic telephone service. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge for the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.