Algeria vs Mozambique: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Algeria
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 225 current LCU against 150 current LCU in Algeria, a difference of 75 current LCU.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Algeria's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 34th and Mozambique ranks 31st of 50 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 107 current LCU | 46,761 current LCU | 46,654 current LCU | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 170 current LCU | 110,832 current LCU | 110,662 current LCU | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 150 current LCU | 225 current LCU | 75 current LCU | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Algeria or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 225 current LCU against 150 current LCU in Algeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Algeria and Mozambique?
- 75 current LCU, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Mozambique?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Algeria and Mozambique rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Algeria ranks 34th and Mozambique ranks 31st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.