Angola vs Cabo Verde: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Angola
- Cabo Verde
How they compare
Angola currently reports 900 current LCU against 443.4 current LCU in Cabo Verde, a difference of 456.6 current LCU.
That makes Angola's figure about 2.0 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Angola ranks 27th and Cabo Verde ranks 30th of 50 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Cabo Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Cabo Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.52 current LCU | 250 current LCU | 241.48 current LCU | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 657.5 current LCU | 387.14 current LCU | 270.36 current LCU | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Angola or Cabo Verde?
- Angola, at 900 current LCU against 443.4 current LCU in Cabo Verde as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Angola and Cabo Verde?
- 456.6 current LCU, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cabo Verde?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do Angola and Cabo Verde rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Angola ranks 27th and Cabo Verde ranks 30th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.