Benin vs Mauritania: Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU)
Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU) over time
- Benin
- Mauritania
How they compare
Benin currently reports 2,700 current LCU against 2,394 current LCU in Mauritania, a difference of 306 current LCU.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.
Benin ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 50 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,348 current LCU | 1,295 current LCU | 1,052 current LCU | Benin |
| 2000s | 2,751 current LCU | 1,484 current LCU | 1,267 current LCU | Benin |
| 2010s | 2,700 current LCU | 2,394 current LCU | 306 current LCU | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Benin or Mauritania?
- Benin, at 2,700 current LCU against 2,394 current LCU in Mauritania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Benin and Mauritania?
- 306 current LCU, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Mauritania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Benin and Mauritania rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Benin ranks 20th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.