Botswana vs Lesotho: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Botswana
- Lesotho
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 140 current LCU against 56.12 current LCU in Lesotho, a difference of 83.88 current LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 2.5 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Botswana ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 39th of 50 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.33 current LCU | 28.12 current LCU | 12.79 current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 46.26 current LCU | 44.96 current LCU | 1.3 current LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Botswana or Lesotho?
- Botswana, at 140 current LCU against 56.12 current LCU in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Botswana and Lesotho?
- 83.88 current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lesotho?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2007.
- How do Botswana and Lesotho rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Botswana ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 39th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.