Burkina Faso vs Mauritania: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Burkina Faso
- Mauritania
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2,950 current LCU against 2,394 current LCU in Mauritania, a difference of 556 current LCU.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 18th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 50 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,038 current LCU | 1,388 current LCU | 649.86 current LCU | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 3,245 current LCU | 1,484 current LCU | 1,761 current LCU | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 2,950 current LCU | 2,394 current LCU | 556 current LCU | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Burkina Faso or Mauritania?
- Burkina Faso, at 2,950 current LCU against 2,394 current LCU in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
- 556 current LCU, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mauritania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Burkina Faso and Mauritania rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Burkina Faso ranks 18th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.