Cape Verde vs Mozambique: Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU)
Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU) over time
- Cape Verde
- Mozambique
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 443.4 current LCU against 225 current LCU in Mozambique, a difference of 218.4 current LCU.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 2.0 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mozambique ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 30th and Mozambique ranks 31st of 50 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 250 current LCU | 51,597 current LCU | 51,347 current LCU | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 318.57 current LCU | 110,832 current LCU | 110,514 current LCU | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Cape Verde or Mozambique?
- Cape Verde, at 443.4 current LCU against 225 current LCU in Mozambique as of 2009.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Cape Verde and Mozambique?
- 218.4 current LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mozambique?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do Cape Verde and Mozambique rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 30th and Mozambique ranks 31st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.