Cameroon vs Senegal: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Cameroon
- Senegal
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 3,578 current LCU against 3,135 current LCU in Senegal, a difference of 443 current LCU.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Senegal ahead.
Cameroon ranks 15th and Senegal ranks 16th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,792 current LCU | 2,350 current LCU | 558.25 current LCU | Senegal |
| 2000s | 1,798 current LCU | 2,929 current LCU | 1,131 current LCU | Senegal |
| 2010s | 3,578 current LCU | 3,135 current LCU | 442.5 current LCU | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Cameroon or Senegal?
- Cameroon, at 3,578 current LCU against 3,135 current LCU in Senegal as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Cameroon and Senegal?
- 443 current LCU, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Senegal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Cameroon and Senegal rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Cameroon ranks 15th and Senegal ranks 16th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.