Comoros vs Djibouti: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Comoros
- Djibouti
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 2,250 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 1,250 current LCU.
That makes Comoros's figure about 2.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Djibouti ahead.
Comoros ranks 22nd and Djibouti ranks 24th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Djibouti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,125 current LCU | 3,500 current LCU | 1,375 current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 2,250 current LCU | 1,750 current LCU | 500 current LCU | Comoros |
| 2010s | 2,250 current LCU | 1,000 current LCU | 1,250 current LCU | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Comoros or Djibouti?
- Comoros, at 2,250 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Djibouti as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Comoros and Djibouti?
- 1,250 current LCU, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Djibouti?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Comoros and Djibouti rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Comoros ranks 22nd and Djibouti ranks 24th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.