Congo vs Gabon: Business telephone monthly subscription

Congo
7,140 current LCU
in 1994
Gabon
17,700 current LCU
in 2008
Congo rank
8th
Gabon rank
6th

Business telephone monthly subscription over time

  • Congo
  • Gabon
5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k17.5k199019992008

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 17,700 current LCU against 7,140 current LCU in Congo, a difference of 10,560 current LCU.

That makes Gabon's figure about 2.5 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gabon ahead.

Congo ranks 8th and Gabon ranks 6th of 50 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Congo or Gabon?
Gabon, at 17,700 current LCU against 7,140 current LCU in Congo as of 2008.
What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Congo and Gabon?
10,560 current LCU, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Gabon?
5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1994.
How do Congo and Gabon rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
Congo ranks 8th and Gabon ranks 6th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
50 places, 909 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.