Côte d'Ivoire vs Mali: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Mali
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 7,080 current LCU against 4,650 current LCU in Mali, a difference of 2,430 current LCU.
That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.5 times Mali's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Côte d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Mali ranks 11th of 50 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,314 current LCU | 1,677 current LCU | 1,637 current LCU | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 6,798 current LCU | 3,820 current LCU | 2,978 current LCU | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Côte d'Ivoire or Mali?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 7,080 current LCU against 4,650 current LCU in Mali as of 2009.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Côte d'Ivoire and Mali?
- 2,430 current LCU, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Mali?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2009.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Mali rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 9th and Mali ranks 11th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.