Egypt vs Sierra Leone: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Egypt
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 31.85 current LCU against 26.4 current LCU in Egypt, a difference of 5.45 current LCU.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 45th of 50 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.25 current LCU | 1,900 current LCU | 1,894 current LCU | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 7.5 current LCU | 2,000 current LCU | 1,992 current LCU | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 26.4 current LCU | 31.85 current LCU | 5.45 current LCU | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Egypt or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 31.85 current LCU against 26.4 current LCU in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Egypt and Sierra Leone?
- 5.45 current LCU, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sierra Leone?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Sierra Leone rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Egypt ranks 46th and Sierra Leone ranks 45th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.