Egypt vs Sudan: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Egypt
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 40 current LCU against 26.4 current LCU in Egypt, a difference of 13.6 current LCU.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 44th of 50 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34 current LCU | 16.6 current LCU | 17.4 current LCU | Egypt |
| 1990s | 6.25 current LCU | 446 current LCU | 439.75 current LCU | Sudan |
| 2000s | 11.5 current LCU | 548.12 current LCU | 536.62 current LCU | Sudan |
| 2010s | 26.4 current LCU | 40 current LCU | 13.6 current LCU | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Egypt or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 40 current LCU against 26.4 current LCU in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Egypt and Sudan?
- 13.6 current LCU, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sudan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Sudan rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Egypt ranks 46th and Sudan ranks 44th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.