Egypt vs Zimbabwe: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Egypt
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 26.4 current LCU against 5 current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 21.4 current LCU.
That makes Egypt's figure about 5.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Egypt ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.25 current LCU | 14.49 current LCU | 8.24 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 12.8 current LCU | 5,169 current LCU | 5,156 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 26.4 current LCU | 5 current LCU | 21.4 current LCU | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Egypt or Zimbabwe?
- Egypt, at 26.4 current LCU against 5 current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Egypt and Zimbabwe?
- 21.4 current LCU, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Egypt and Zimbabwe rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Egypt ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.