Ethiopia vs Sudan: Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU)
Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU) over time
- Ethiopia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 40 current LCU against 19.55 current LCU in Ethiopia, a difference of 20.45 current LCU.
That makes Sudan's figure about 2.0 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 47th and Sudan ranks 44th of 50 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.29 current LCU | 446 current LCU | 430.71 current LCU | Sudan |
| 2000s | 17 current LCU | 547.86 current LCU | 530.86 current LCU | Sudan |
| 2010s | 19.55 current LCU | 40 current LCU | 20.45 current LCU | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Ethiopia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 40 current LCU against 19.55 current LCU in Ethiopia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Ethiopia and Sudan?
- 20.45 current LCU, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Sudan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Ethiopia and Sudan rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Ethiopia ranks 47th and Sudan ranks 44th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.