Ethiopia vs Zimbabwe: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Ethiopia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 19.55 current LCU against 5 current LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 14.55 current LCU.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 3.9 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11 current LCU | 13.33 current LCU | 2.33 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 17 current LCU | 5,169 current LCU | 5,152 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 17 current LCU | 5 current LCU | 12 current LCU | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Ethiopia or Zimbabwe?
- Ethiopia, at 19.55 current LCU against 5 current LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Ethiopia and Zimbabwe?
- 14.55 current LCU, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Ethiopia and Zimbabwe rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Ethiopia ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.