Gambia vs Namibia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Gambia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 79.3 current LCU against 48.42 current LCU in Gambia, a difference of 30.88 current LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.6 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 38th of 50 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35 current LCU | 37.65 current LCU | 2.65 current LCU | Namibia |
| 2000s | 35 current LCU | 52.33 current LCU | 17.33 current LCU | Namibia |
| 2010s | 48.42 current LCU | 79.3 current LCU | 30.88 current LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Gambia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 79.3 current LCU against 48.42 current LCU in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Gambia and Namibia?
- 30.88 current LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Gambia and Namibia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Gambia ranks 41st and Namibia ranks 38th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.