Madagascar vs Uganda: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Madagascar
- Uganda
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 26,000 current LCU against 12,300 current LCU in Uganda, a difference of 13,700 current LCU.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 2.1 times Uganda's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 50 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54,433 current LCU | 7,767 current LCU | 46,667 current LCU | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 27,941 current LCU | 10,000 current LCU | 17,941 current LCU | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 26,000 current LCU | 12,300 current LCU | 13,700 current LCU | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Madagascar or Uganda?
- Madagascar, at 26,000 current LCU against 12,300 current LCU in Uganda as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Madagascar and Uganda?
- 13,700 current LCU, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Madagascar and Uganda rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Madagascar ranks 5th and Uganda ranks 7th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.