Mali vs Tanzania: Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU)
Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU) over time
- Mali
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 6,400 current LCU against 4,650 current LCU in Mali, a difference of 1,750 current LCU.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.4 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 50 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,677 current LCU | 2,056 current LCU | 379 current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 3,820 current LCU | 4,327 current LCU | 506.67 current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 5,310 current LCU | 6,400 current LCU | 1,090 current LCU | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Mali or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 6,400 current LCU against 4,650 current LCU in Mali as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Mali and Tanzania?
- 1,750 current LCU, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Mali and Tanzania rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Mali ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.