Mauritania vs Rwanda: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Mauritania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 2,394 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Rwanda, a difference of 1,394 current LCU.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 2.4 times Rwanda's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 50 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,546 current LCU | 500 current LCU | 1,046 current LCU | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 1,485 current LCU | 937.5 current LCU | 547.25 current LCU | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Mauritania or Rwanda?
- Mauritania, at 2,394 current LCU against 1,000 current LCU in Rwanda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Mauritania and Rwanda?
- 1,394 current LCU, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Rwanda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Mauritania and Rwanda rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Mauritania ranks 21st and Rwanda ranks 24th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.