Senegal vs Togo: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Senegal
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 3,750 current LCU against 3,135 current LCU in Senegal, a difference of 615 current LCU.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 16th and Togo ranks 13th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,237 current LCU | 1,613 current LCU | 624.31 current LCU | Senegal |
| 2000s | 2,929 current LCU | 2,975 current LCU | 46 current LCU | Togo |
| 2010s | 3,135 current LCU | 3,750 current LCU | 615 current LCU | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Senegal or Togo?
- Togo, at 3,750 current LCU against 3,135 current LCU in Senegal as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Senegal and Togo?
- 615 current LCU, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Togo?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Senegal and Togo rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Senegal ranks 16th and Togo ranks 13th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.