Seychelles vs Tunisia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Seychelles
- Tunisia
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 95.91 current LCU against 50 current LCU in Tunisia, a difference of 45.91 current LCU.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.9 times Tunisia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Seychelles ranks 37th and Tunisia ranks 40th of 50 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.59 current LCU | 2.67 current LCU | 68.92 current LCU | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 73.84 current LCU | 3.48 current LCU | 70.35 current LCU | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 89.66 current LCU | 50 current LCU | 39.66 current LCU | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Seychelles or Tunisia?
- Seychelles, at 95.91 current LCU against 50 current LCU in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Seychelles and Tunisia?
- 45.91 current LCU, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Tunisia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Seychelles and Tunisia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Seychelles ranks 37th and Tunisia ranks 40th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in local currency.