Africa vs Morocco: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Africa
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 17.8 current US$ against 6.53 current US$ in Africa, a difference of 11.27 current US$.
That makes Morocco's figure about 2.7 times Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Africa ahead.
Africa ranks 3rd and Morocco ranks 5th of 6 groups.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.4 current US$ | 5.35 current US$ | 0.9484 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2000s | 5.07 current US$ | 14.13 current US$ | 9.06 current US$ | Morocco |
| 2010s | 6.5 current US$ | 17.45 current US$ | 10.95 current US$ | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Africa or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 17.8 current US$ against 6.53 current US$ in Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Africa and Morocco?
- 11.27 current US$, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Morocco?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Africa and Morocco rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Africa ranks 3rd and Morocco ranks 5th of 6 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.