Algeria vs Gambia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Algeria
- Gambia
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 2.06 current US$ against 1.64 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 0.42 current US$.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 41st and Gambia ranks 44th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.09 current US$ | 3.69 current US$ | 0.5975 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 2.48 current US$ | 2.03 current US$ | 0.4478 current US$ | Algeria |
| 2010s | 2.06 current US$ | 1.64 current US$ | 0.4131 current US$ | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Algeria or Gambia?
- Algeria, at 2.06 current US$ against 1.64 current US$ in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Algeria and Gambia?
- 0.42 current US$, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Gambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Algeria and Gambia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Algeria ranks 41st and Gambia ranks 44th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.