Angola vs Namibia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Angola
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 10.92 current US$ against 9.79 current US$ in Angola, a difference of 1.13 current US$.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 10th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.71 current US$ | 9.13 current US$ | 35.58 current US$ | Angola |
| 2000s | 11.06 current US$ | 7.33 current US$ | 3.73 current US$ | Angola |
| 2010s | 9.79 current US$ | 9.88 current US$ | 0.0885 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Angola or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 10.92 current US$ against 9.79 current US$ in Angola as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Angola and Namibia?
- 1.13 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2010.
- How do Angola and Namibia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Angola ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 10th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.