Benin vs Tanzania: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Benin
- Tanzania
How they compare
Benin currently reports 5.45 current US$ against 4.54 current US$ in Tanzania, a difference of 0.91 current US$.
That makes Benin's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 34th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 49 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.18 current US$ | 4.53 current US$ | 0.6449 current US$ | Benin |
| 2000s | 4.98 current US$ | 4.11 current US$ | 0.8727 current US$ | Benin |
| 2010s | 5.45 current US$ | 4.54 current US$ | 0.9101 current US$ | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Benin or Tanzania?
- Benin, at 5.45 current US$ against 4.54 current US$ in Tanzania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Benin and Tanzania?
- 0.91 current US$, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Tanzania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2010.
- How do Benin and Tanzania rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Benin ranks 34th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.