Burundi vs Ethiopia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Burundi
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 1.16 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi, a difference of 0.3307 current US$.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.4 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 46th and Ethiopia ranks 45th of 49 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.67 current US$ | 2.32 current US$ | 0.6498 current US$ | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 0.4437 current US$ | 1.99 current US$ | 1.55 current US$ | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 0.8293 current US$ | 1.18 current US$ | 0.3504 current US$ | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Burundi or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 1.16 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Burundi and Ethiopia?
- 0.3307 current US$, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Ethiopia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Ethiopia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Burundi ranks 46th and Ethiopia ranks 45th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.