Burundi vs Ghana: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Burundi
- Ghana
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.8293 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ghana, a difference of 0.8293 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Burundi ranks 46th and Ghana ranks 48th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.7 current US$ | 1.68 current US$ | 0.0234 current US$ | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0.4673 current US$ | 1.59 current US$ | 1.12 current US$ | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.8293 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 0.8293 current US$ | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Burundi or Ghana?
- Burundi, at 0.8293 current US$ against 0 current US$ in Ghana as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Burundi and Ghana?
- 0.8293 current US$, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Ghana?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Ghana rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Burundi ranks 46th and Ghana ranks 48th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.