Burundi vs Rwanda: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Burundi
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.83 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi, a difference of 1 current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.2 times Burundi's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 49 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.19 current US$ | 1.66 current US$ | 0.4698 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.4437 current US$ | 1.83 current US$ | 1.39 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Burundi or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1.83 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi as of 2007.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Burundi and Rwanda?
- 1 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
- How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Burundi ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 43rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.