Cape Verde vs Malawi: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Cape Verde
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 5.75 current US$ against 5.59 current US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.16 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Malawi ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 31st of 49 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.03 current US$ | 4.49 current US$ | 1.46 current US$ | Malawi |
| 2000s | 2.41 current US$ | 1.19 current US$ | 1.21 current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Cape Verde or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 5.75 current US$ against 5.59 current US$ in Cape Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Cape Verde and Malawi?
- 0.16 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malawi?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2005.
- How do Cape Verde and Malawi rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Malawi ranks 31st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.