Cape Verde vs Uganda: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Cape Verde
- Uganda
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 5.59 current US$ against 4.88 current US$ in Uganda, a difference of 0.71 current US$.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 35th of 49 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.97 current US$ | 5.91 current US$ | 2.94 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2000s | 3.26 current US$ | 5.53 current US$ | 2.27 current US$ | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Cape Verde or Uganda?
- Cape Verde, at 5.59 current US$ against 4.88 current US$ in Uganda as of 2009.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Cape Verde and Uganda?
- 0.71 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Uganda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Cape Verde and Uganda rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Uganda ranks 35th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.