Cameroon vs Senegal: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Cameroon
- Senegal
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 7.22 current US$ against 6.64 current US$ in Senegal, a difference of 0.58 current US$.
That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Senegal ahead.
Cameroon ranks 21st and Senegal ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.22 current US$ | 4.22 current US$ | 0.9995 current US$ | Senegal |
| 2000s | 3 current US$ | 4.88 current US$ | 1.88 current US$ | Senegal |
| 2010s | 7.22 current US$ | 6.33 current US$ | 0.8934 current US$ | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Cameroon or Senegal?
- Cameroon, at 7.22 current US$ against 6.64 current US$ in Senegal as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Cameroon and Senegal?
- 0.58 current US$, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Senegal?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Cameroon and Senegal rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Cameroon ranks 21st and Senegal ranks 23rd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.