Central African Republic vs Chad: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Central African Republic
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 6.06 current US$ against 5.82 current US$ in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.24 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 30th and Chad ranks 27th of 49 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.37 current US$ | 8.95 current US$ | 1.58 current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | 5.68 current US$ | 6.17 current US$ | 0.4927 current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Central African Republic or Chad?
- Chad, at 6.06 current US$ against 5.82 current US$ in Central African Republic as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Central African Republic and Chad?
- 0.24 current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Chad?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Central African Republic and Chad rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Central African Republic ranks 30th and Chad ranks 27th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.