Congo vs Mali: Business telephone monthly subscription

Congo
12.86 current US$
in 1994
Mali
9.85 current US$
in 2011
Congo rank
8th
Mali rank
11th

Business telephone monthly subscription over time

  • Congo
  • Mali
5101520199020002011

How they compare

Congo currently reports 12.86 current US$ against 9.85 current US$ in Mali, a difference of 3.01 current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Mali's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 8th and Mali ranks 11th of 49 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Congo or Mali?
Congo, at 12.86 current US$ against 9.85 current US$ in Mali as of 1994.
What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Congo and Mali?
3.01 current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mali?
5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1994.
How do Congo and Mali rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
Congo ranks 8th and Mali ranks 11th of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,007 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.