Côte d'Ivoire vs Sudan: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 15 current US$ against 14.99 current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.01 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Sudan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 6th of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 8.68 current US$ | 170.6 current US$ | 161.92 current US$ | Sudan |
| 1990s | 6.7 current US$ | 12.22 current US$ | 5.52 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2000s | 11.86 current US$ | 2.26 current US$ | 9.6 current US$ | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Côte d'Ivoire or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 15 current US$ against 14.99 current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Côte d'Ivoire and Sudan?
- 0.01 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Sudan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2007.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Sudan rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 7th and Sudan ranks 6th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.