Egypt vs Guinea: Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$)
Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$) over time
- Egypt
- Guinea
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 4.45 current US$ against 2.65 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 1.8 current US$.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.7 times Guinea's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 37th and Guinea ranks 40th of 49 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.87 current US$ | 3.39 current US$ | 1.53 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 1.93 current US$ | 3 current US$ | 1.07 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Egypt or Guinea?
- Egypt, at 4.45 current US$ against 2.65 current US$ in Guinea as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Egypt and Guinea?
- 1.8 current US$, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guinea?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Egypt and Guinea rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Egypt ranks 37th and Guinea ranks 40th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.