Gabon vs North Africa: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Gabon
- North Africa
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 39.53 current US$ against 11.12 current US$ in North Africa, a difference of 28.41 current US$.
That makes Gabon's figure about 3.6 times North Africa's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 1st and North Africa ranks 1st of 49 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | North Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.17 current US$ | 3.52 current US$ | 15.65 current US$ | Gabon |
| 2000s | 18.73 current US$ | 2.92 current US$ | 15.81 current US$ | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Gabon or North Africa?
- Gabon, at 39.53 current US$ against 11.12 current US$ in North Africa as of 2008.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Gabon and North Africa?
- 28.41 current US$, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and North Africa?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
- How do Gabon and North Africa rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Gabon ranks 1st and North Africa ranks 1st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.