Gambia vs Sierra Leone: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Gambia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1.64 current US$ against 0.008 current US$ in Sierra Leone, a difference of 1.63 current US$.
That makes Gambia's figure about 205.3 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Gambia ranks 44th and Sierra Leone ranks 47th of 49 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.69 current US$ | 3.12 current US$ | 0.5703 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 2.24 current US$ | 0.9719 current US$ | 1.27 current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Gambia or Sierra Leone?
- Gambia, at 1.64 current US$ against 0.008 current US$ in Sierra Leone as of 2011.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Gambia and Sierra Leone?
- 1.63 current US$, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sierra Leone?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2002.
- How do Gambia and Sierra Leone rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Gambia ranks 44th and Sierra Leone ranks 47th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.