Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.54 current US$ against 3.43 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.11 current US$.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 38th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 49 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.54 current US$ against 3.43 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2010.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.11 current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1997.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 38th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.