Rwanda vs Somalia: Business telephone monthly subscription
Business telephone monthly subscription over time
- Rwanda
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 2.06 current US$ against 1.83 current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 0.23 current US$.
That makes Somalia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Somalia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 43rd and Somalia ranks 42nd of 49 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.59 current US$ | 2.26 current US$ | 0.6736 current US$ | Somalia |
| 2000s | 1.78 current US$ | 1.65 current US$ | 0.138 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, Rwanda or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 2.06 current US$ against 1.83 current US$ in Rwanda as of 2005.
- What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between Rwanda and Somalia?
- 0.23 current US$, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Somalia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2005.
- How do Rwanda and Somalia rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
- Rwanda ranks 43rd and Somalia ranks 42nd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.