South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Business telephone monthly subscription

South Africa
26.42 current US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
6.53 current US$
in 2011
South Africa rank
3rd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd

Business telephone monthly subscription over time

  • South Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
510152025199020002011

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 26.42 current US$ against 6.53 current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 19.89 current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 4.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 19 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd of 49 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 11.4 current US$ 4.54 current US$ 6.86 current US$ South Africa
2000s 15.38 current US$ 5.2 current US$ 10.18 current US$ South Africa
2010s 25.69 current US$ 6.58 current US$ 19.11 current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher business telephone monthly subscription, South Africa or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
South Africa, at 26.42 current US$ against 6.53 current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2011.
What is the difference in business telephone monthly subscription between South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
19.89 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
19 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for business telephone monthly subscription?
South Africa ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd of 49 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Business telephone monthly subscription. Statizoid, drawing on International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/business-telephone-monthly-subscription-current-us/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/business-telephone-monthly-subscription-current-us/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Business telephone monthly subscription</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Business telephone monthly subscription (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
55 places, 1,007 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN in US$. The charge should cover the rental of the line but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.