Eswatini vs Rwanda: External capital grants
Eswatini
0 current LCU
in 2011
Rwanda
3 current LCU
in 2011
Eswatini rank
20th
Rwanda rank
18th
External capital grants over time
- Eswatini
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Eswatini, a difference of 3 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.
Eswatini ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 54 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1970s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1980s | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | 0 current LCU | — |
| 1990s | 30.78 million current LCU | 1.07 billion current LCU | 1.04 billion current LCU | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 23.48 million current LCU | -0.2 current LCU | 23.48 million current LCU | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 current LCU | 2.5 current LCU | 2.5 current LCU | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher external capital grants, Eswatini or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 3 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in external capital grants between Eswatini and Rwanda?
- 3 current LCU, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Rwanda rank globally for external capital grants?
- Eswatini ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 54 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as External capital grants (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Grants are unrequited, nonrepayable, noncompulsory receipts of government from other governments or international institutions. In determination of the deficit/surplus, grants are grouped with revenue and expenditure rather than with financing. Values are